|
Benchmarking tornado vs twisted-web vs tornado-on-twisted
(antoniocangiano.com)
cached 4 months ago
|
|
Twisted.web vs Tornado, a Performance test
(apparatusproject.org)
cached 4 months ago
|
|
Twisted.web vs Tornado Performance, part deux
(apparatusproject.org)
cached 4 months ago
|
|
cached 4 months ago
Needs more tornado. Or, err, twisted.web.
|
|
Tornado on Twisted
(github.com)
cached 4 months ago
|
|
cached 4 months ago
Am I mis-reading that graph or is it the case that twisted.web handles half the concurrent connections that tornado does /and/ more slowly? Is it possible that twisted performing "almost as well" as tornado might be exaggerated?
|
|
cached 4 months ago
Well, if this benchmark from yesterday is accurate, then Twisted can't handle as many concurrent connections as Tornado. I'd say that's a good reason not to use Twisted. http://www.apparatusproject.org/blog/2009/09/twisted-web-vs-... |
|
cached 4 months ago
I did split the machines. The driver (the one running the test) machine is completely different than the webserver running twisted.web or tornado.
|
|
cached 3 months ago
I'm curious how this compares to twisted.web/tornado in terms of use case (friendfeed type sites). Can anyone quickly explain this to me? Thanks!
|
|
cached 4 months ago
How does tornado on twisted perform relative to tornado?
|
SearchYC.com |
|
| All | Comments | Submissions | Users | Within Results |